Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Owl on old treetrunk.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Owl on old treetrunk.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2008 at 21:23:05
Info created by Vbandke - uploaded by Vbandke - nominated by Vbandke -- Vbandke (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Vbandke (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Georgez (talk) 22:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment You oppose the picture because it is too small. But the size is 2.132 × 2.843 Pixel, Dateigröße: 3,61 MB, MIME-Typ: image/jpeg. What is the problem here? -- Vbandke (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment I would definitely give my support if the species name of the owl could be found. It is a nice picture! JalalV (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment I think the name of the owl can be found in the category of the image. Estrilda (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment The name of the owl is (I believe) Asio otus (Waldohreule) -- Vbandke (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, didn't see it earlier. JalalV (talk) 13:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Support --JalalV (talk) 13:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Support Wow! Very nice. --Lošmi (talk) 10:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment Oh no, it has nothing to do with the size of the picture! It's just because that was no "wow factor" for me. Regards, Georgez (talk) 20:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, my mistake, somehow. I clicked on the "Discussion" hyperlink in your "oppose" post, and there was the text saying the picture were too small. This text is, IOW, unrelated to my picure. Sorry about the misinterpretation. -- Vbandke (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Ya rly →Diti the penguin — 08:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Support For the wonderful feather detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose For the tight crop at the top. Lycaon (talk) 01:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment You wouldn't believe it, but I did that on purpose: a) to move the main subject more way from the optical center, and b) to reduce the amount of (nearly all) black area on the picture. But, of course, each to his own taste :) If I would re-crop it, should the image than be renominated? Or, what is the correct procedure to follow in such (or similar) cases) -- with kind regards Vbandke (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment Maybe I would support a less cropped version, but don't worry, as it stands now, your image will scrape through: 5/2 is the minimal ratio for promotion ;-). Lycaon (talk) 00:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment You should not try to earn a living by predicting the future ?! :) -- with kind regards Vbandke (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- I was only 7 hrs wrong ;-) Sorry. Lycaon (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Per lycaon, else would support it --Pom² (talk) 14:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment I re-cropped the image, and didn't like it. IOW, I leave the image as is, and will not upload an edited version. Thanks for your opinion nevertheless -- with kind regards Vbandke (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 19:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)