Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Orange Spring Mound in Yellowstone National Park 1.jpg

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support stunning picture, well done. —αἰτίας •discussion• 16:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 08:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated. Lycaon (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At first after reading the comment I wanted to make my image look dull (not "Oversaturated"), but then I decided what for? You would come with another reason to oppose, don't you, Hans. BTW about "Oversaturated", here are few samples from Flickr [1] (103 comments 99 faves};[2] ( 19 comments 27 faves} and a dull one (not "Oversaturated") [3] ( no comments no faves}. No my image is not oversaturated at all. The image correctly represents the beautiful and briliant colors of the mound.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel like it was unproperly processed; resulting in soft parts mixed with sharp parts. Is it due to NR ? Colours aren't as impressive as the ones on the links provided (but they seem have used polarizer filters contrary to you). Benh (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I even do not know (and do not like to know) what NR is. How you know they used polarizer filters? Please do not respond. It is just a a rhetorical question.The rock has uneven structure and that's why some parts are sharper than another. Here's one more sample from Flickr [4] to compare. In a mean time I've got more than enough from way too smart for me reviews. --Mbz1 (talk) 21:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: withdrawn => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 22:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu