Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Nathan Twining photo portrait head and shoulders.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Nominate
Now before you get all huffy, I'm Australian. I just think it's a really good, statesman-like portrait. pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but what is special about it ? It is just yet another paused portrait. I also have good photographs of myself taken my photomathons, which I consider quite a remarquable achievement, but I don't list them here ! :) Rama 10:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)- Oppose In case this picture should have any excellent feature, it escapes me. I can only see a boring portrait of very limited quality. Calderwood 11:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 07:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 18:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)- Oppose I am unable to see any reason whatsoever why this picture should deserve to be featured. Maybe someone could explain its hidden qualities to me. Roger McLassus 14:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry Elise, I too cannot see where's the exceptionality here... What differentiates between this and a million others soldiers'/politicians' standard poses? --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 04:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe nothing, except I don't spend a lot of time looking at standard soldier/politican portraits, so I am not disillusioned like you all. ;) Or mroe likely it's just that I have lower standards than most voters here. pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks a bit like Bert from Sesame Street... but even that is not enough to make it special! ;-) Francisco M. Marzoa 16:54, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
2 support, 5 oppose --> not featured Roger McLassus 11:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
