Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Museum of the Riverina-WCC.jpg

Info created by Bidgee - uploaded by Bidgee - nominated by Bidgee -- Bidgee 17:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bidgee 17:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice building, but why for FP? --Karelj 20:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's an historic building which has lasted floods, the great depression as well as redevelopment of the area which many buildings have since been replaced. Bidgee 07:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted Mfield 02:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted, insufficient wow and not a good enough composition (why the car, for example?). Sorry, this is just not FP material. --MichaelMaggs 06:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How is it tilted (just a question)? It's located on a hill but I can't help trying not getting a car in the shot as it's a main road. Any ideas on how it could become something with wow? Bidgee 07:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Every vertical in the image is a degree or so to the left - see the flagpole and roadsigns. Also the right side of the building is tilted in even more so, suffering from perspective distortion. Mfield 17:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - [1] You might find this interesting (hugin.sourceforge.net) if you are thinking about improving the perspective distortion. --Freedom to share 20:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think those are sufficient reasons for FPX. It's only very slightly tilted (probably more perspective than tilt), and I don't see the obstruction. --Dori - Talk 02:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1 support, 3 oppose >> not featured (rule of the 5th day) -- Alvesgaspar 20:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu