Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:LA MAGIE DES LANTERNES 3.jpg

Image:LA MAGIE DES LANTERNES 3.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Acarpentier - uploaded by Acarpentier - nominated by Acarpentier --Acarpentier 16:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Night shot at ISO 1600 to make it possible. So it is normal that the grains are bigger. Acarpentier 18:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Acarpentier 16:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I love this picture, but there's just too much noise. JaGa 19:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I do not agree JaGa. Because of the nature of this picture, the noise is acceptable. The Subject is great. Mayaboy 22:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC) sockpuppet. Lycaon 22:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Terrible noise.--Beyond silence 07:41, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Question You think some postprocessing could help. Is there a tutorial somewhere in wiki to do so with this kind of picture? Acarpentier 16:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Nice picture -- Pudelek 08:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition, great subject. And for the noise, if you were a photographer, you would know that you couldn’t do it better on a night shot. Falcone 12:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC) sockpuppet. Lycaon 22:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

No need to be snarky, Falcone. I know what ISO 1600 means. It's a great shot, but based on what I've seen here, I don't think people will vote for it because of the posterization. JaGa 15:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I didn’t meant to be snarky or sarcastic in any way. I’m only judging this photography against basic constraint of photography. If people would never do so, it would mean that we could never appreciate pictures taken in that kind of environment, which would be regrettable. Falcone 16:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC) (warning: sockpuppet). Doodle-doo Ħ 22:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

May some postprocessing can help on it. --Beyond silence 13:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

No, it would affect the quality of the photography. I agree with Mayaboy, due to the nature of this picture the grain is totally normal. Falcone 14:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC) (warning: sockpuppet). Doodle-doo Ħ 22:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Overexposed (see the swan) and noisy - Alvesgaspar 16:41, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Alvesgaspar. Lycaon 11:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice picture but noisy and a bit overexposed. --Egg 11:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral I love the mood in this picture, but on the other hand i to believe it's overexposed and noisy. user: Jellobie
•  Support I think, that quality is not so bad and composition and impression (WOW or how you call this) factor is great. --Karelj 22:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
•  OpposeOf ocourse honesty of a photographer is not one of the selection criteria, but still oppose for sockpuppet--Mbz1 01:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

This is ridiculous, there are no sockpuppet, read my talk.

•  Support Poromiami 6:16 3 October 2007 (CEST) I love this one.
•  Support fantastic composition, definite wow factor present --Ben^hello! 12:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. --Benchat 08:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)