Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Gélinotte huppée réserve de matane (2005-08).JPG

—Sébastien Savard 21:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Sébastien Savard 21:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral good pic but don't like composition: bird too small and partly hidden ♦ Pabix ^ℹ 22:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose subject too small and distracting background/environment. --Dschwen 23:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK Dschen and the exposure is also not very outstanding --SehLax 11:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for already mentioned reasons Hein 14:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK Dschwen, SehLax norro 16:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Calderwood 12:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why should only the bird be the thematic centre of the pic? I like the slightly chaotic mix of its few colours, and many elements in different degrees of sharpness. I find interesting the "distraction" created by the richness of the general, complex texture. The soft, uneven mix of greens, browns and lilacs dotted with reds makes the feeling linger. --Piolinfax 15:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree strongly with Piolinfax. And how many of the opposers have actually tried to take photos of wild birds? - MPF 19:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose--Shizhao 01:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject blends into background. --Janke | Talk 08:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If this picture were a generic picture of nature, I'd support. But this is supposed to be the picture of a specific bird, who is not as visible in the photograph as it should be. Messedrocker 14:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it's neither a very good picture of the bird, the nature nor both. -- Gorgo 16:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3 Support, 9 Oppose, 1 neutral => Not Featured--Shizhao 02:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu