Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Death of Marat by David.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Death of Marat by David.jpg, not featured
[edit]- Info created by www.wga.hu - uploaded by Kelson - nominated by El ComandanteHasta ∞ 20:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support A masterpiece of french painting. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 20:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose resolution. --Wikimol 14:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- A 1001x1287 res is not enough? What kind of screen can show it complete? Moreover, a lot of featured pictures are 1024*768 (i.e: Image:Port_wine.jpg, Image:Kerala_India_tea_fields.jpg) and sometime smaller (i.e:Image:Karachi_-_Pakistan-market.jpg). I hope you'll reconsider your decision.
- El ComandanteHasta ∞ 15:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Let me first make one thing clear - I'm not voting about quality of Death of Marat, that's without question. In case of such reproductions I consider only technical quality (full uncropped picture, colors, and resolution). The origanl has 162 x 128 cm ... at 300dpi, that would be 20k x 15k pixels - that would be real digital reproduction, allowing to study also structure of the painting. 1287x768 means good print of postcard size... IMO that's not enoug to call a reproduction good. Where it was said Commons are media library for viewing on screen only? --Wikimol 15:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Where it was said Commons must be a media library for print? To my point of vue, it's a media library for all the other Wikiprojects. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 21:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Because other wikimedia projects may want to have printed edition. Or someone may just want to print specific article. Commons shoud aim at resolutions suitable for print. --Wikimol 22:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Where it was said Commons must be a media library for print? To my point of vue, it's a media library for all the other Wikiprojects. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 21:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, there are smaller FP, some of which should eventually be defeatured. Generally, the case of digital photography is IMO different, digital photohraph itself is the "original", usually in a way "creative" and "unique" work. Reproduction of David's painting is not (the painting is). --Wikimol 15:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Let me first make one thing clear - I'm not voting about quality of Death of Marat, that's without question. In case of such reproductions I consider only technical quality (full uncropped picture, colors, and resolution). The origanl has 162 x 128 cm ... at 300dpi, that would be 20k x 15k pixels - that would be real digital reproduction, allowing to study also structure of the painting. 1287x768 means good print of postcard size... IMO that's not enoug to call a reproduction good. Where it was said Commons are media library for viewing on screen only? --Wikimol 15:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --- gildemax 12:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Gérard Janot 18:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support - MPF 00:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Support--83.165.98.117 15:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)IPs can't vote. Please create you an account if you want to vote. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 19:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)- Support--Konstable 08:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Support, 3 Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)