Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Daucus carota May 2008-1.jpg

Image:Daucus carota May 2008-1.jpg

Original (left) - not featured

•  Info The umbel of a wild carrot (Daucus carota) has began to open. Created and nominated by Alvesgaspar 11:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar 11:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral for now. It is a very nice photo. But I think the composition lives by the symmetry of the plant thus I would prefer if the stern would be straight vertical. --AngMoKio 17:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per my vote on the other version. -- Ram-Man 02:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

1 support, 1 neutral, 1 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 18:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Rotated (right) - not featured

•  Info -- Absolutely right, rotation performed. Also, some minor clone work, to preserve size -- Alvesgaspar 18:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar 18:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support perfect! --AngMoKio 18:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer 21:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support wonderful --norro 12:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment There are some strange artefacts/lines on the bottom of the background left of the stem. The work with the cloning tool in this area isn't nicely done. Explicit posterization. --Richard Bartz 15:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Sorry but I can't see anything. Could you please indicate where the artifacts are? -- Alvesgaspar 15:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Sure. --Richard Bartz 17:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Well, I see nothing! Let's wait for other sharp eyes. One of us needs to change the monitor ;-) -- Alvesgaspar 19:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --B.navez 19:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Richard Bartz. The areas in between the spikes on the left seem to have been inexpertly dealt with. And what are those two dark curved parallel lines in the bottom right-hand quadrant? --MichaelMaggs 21:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to the lighting and overexposure of the white flowers. The posterization is not an issue because it comes with such a smooth background (lack of detail is the bokeh point!) -- Ram-Man 01:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose flash and overexposure of the white flowers --Beyond silence 14:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose posterization, DoF, lighting - the white flowers are overblown --Richard Bartz 07:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

5 support, 4 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 18:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)