Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ChichenItza-Dic2004.jpg

Image:ChichenItza-Dic2004.jpg, not featured

• Self-nomination This one is a bigger and better picture than the last one. Please refresh your cache because it has the same file name and you might be looking at an older version.--Fito hg 00:59, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support AtelierJoly 07:05, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support On the other hand, I like the topic. On the other hand, the colors are dull. As others have written on other pictures, this is a famous location, so we should be able to get better pictures. But still, this one is good. David.Monniaux 08:05, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --norro 11:01, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Ranveig 19:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Dull colors -- Fabien1309 16:50, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. villy 10:41, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral I think the colors are (now?) more dramatic than dull. What is iritating me are the artifacts in the grass in the foreground. Perhaps the preprocessing resulted in a sequence of JPG savings at lower resolution? Perhaps a higher resolution image with "real" gras could gain a "Support" from me. Andreas Tille 12:48, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - badly needs people in the pic to give scale - Arpingstone 20:47, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 14:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral see comment of Andreas Tille and the one of David.Monniaux Pabix ܀ 06:20, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral. Not bad, but perhaps we could get a better one of this very famous, much visited and photographed monument? Ideally, I'd like to be able to make out more of the sculptural detail in the big version, and not have so much ininteresting sky. -- Infrogmation 17:19, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• 5 Oppose - 3 Support - 3 Neutral => not featured