Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cathedrale de Coutances.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Cathedrale de Coutances.jpg (~ 800x1035 without the frame), Not Featured
[edit]- Nominate
// Urban 05:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support // Urban 05:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support technically impressive, and the name of the photographer is very discrete ♦ Pabix ℹ 07:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Godewind 08:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Gloumouth1 08:25, 7 December 2005 (UTC) - but crop the frame and remove the signature... --Gloumouth1 22:18, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral — The white border makes the image bigger than it really is, plus visible copyright text. ADSR6581 12:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose with this white frame. It may look good on a dark background but it makes it difficult to use the image in Wikipedia etc. I'd voted pro without the frame --SehLax 13:46, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support - but yes, please crop that white frame! - MPF 16:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Elgaard 17:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 18:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 01:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, It has a giant white frame and a distracting author name in the bottom-right corner, there's no need for the latter since the license being used for the image guarentees atribution. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 11:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support pfctdayelise 01:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support Thuresson 06:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support. villy ♦✎ 08:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Janek 21:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. With or without the frame. No utilities, we can see nothing complete. A very bad composition for a interieur Church. Petrus 22:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose ACK Petrus norro 20:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - E rulez 08:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support - I think it's stunning. Renata3 03:47, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - The author name in the right corner makes it clearly non-featured. Andreas Tille 06:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Perspective distortion at the bottom of the frame is probably unavoidable, but is too strong for my liking. -- Solipsist 09:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
12 Support, 8 Oppose, 1 Neutral => Not Featured--Shizhao 01:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC)