Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Boulogne Dome 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Boulogne Dome 01.jpg, not featured
[edit]Info created by MJJR - uploaded by MJJR - nominated by MJJR -- MJJR 20:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Support -- MJJR 20:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose This is a great idea, but the uneven crop and framing ruin it. Definitely retake this picture if you can. --Digon3 talk 20:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Good, but too dark. --Beyond silence 05:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Support warum nicht --Böhringer 20:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose quite nice, but should be symetrical -- Bjodr 09:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose After several days looking at it again and again I think I have to oppose for the asymmetry. It is a very striking image and I think the exposure is perfect. The crop is maybe a little tight but it doesn't bother me much. If you get a chance to redo the picture... --MichaD | Michael Apel 14:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment To Bjodr and MichaD: I also like symmetric pictures. But according to some people - also and especially here at Commons - symmetric is 'uninspired' and even 'boring'... and they are not always wrong. That's the reason why I preferred an asymmetric point of view for this picture here. It's of course always a question of personal preference. -- MJJR 19:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose - it'd be nice if it was simmetrical. Dantadd✉ 22:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Please say why you are opposing. --MichaelMaggs 21:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Please say why you are opposing. --MichaelMaggs 21:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Support Lack of symmetry is secondary. Excellent perspective. --RedCoat 12:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Support Very nice picture, maybe dimensions could be better if it will be square and not rectangle. --Karelj 21:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Support Strong support. The slight lack of symetry makes it look better. Could be slightly sharper. --Tos 11:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice, I like it a lot, especially the asymmetrical composition. The exposure is very good, the highlights are not much burned and there are many details in the low lights, but… the blue edge effect of the CCD around the windows should be corrected through a software, the image fails a little bit of dof for the statues and at the lower levels (use again the tripod, but with a higher F number – I don't know if you can choose it with the A620)… and the picture should be square, due to the composition. This last is the worse for this photograph. Sting 00:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 15:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)