Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bolivian vizcacha.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Bolivian vizcacha.jpg, featured
[edit]- Info A vizcacha in the Sur Lipez desert, Bolivia. This was taken in the same spot than Sur Lipez.jpg.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Nattfodd --Nattfodd 15:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Nattfodd 15:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP detail, composition. How did you think?
Sorry, you should try Commons:Quality images candidates first! --Beyond silence 16:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- No FP detail? Give me a break, you can count the hairs on his fur or on his ears! And what about composition? I have trouble imagining a better composition for describing a vizcacha on wikipedia! --Nattfodd 16:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support The foreground grass is a little bit spoiling the image, but I like the rest of the image a lot. Lycaon 17:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very good picture of a wild animal in its natural environment. Vassil 20:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is good, but the grass is too disturbing for me. --Digon3 talk 21:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- How so? It hardly hides any part of the animal and is not very high either. --Nattfodd 22:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Good picture, and falls nicely within the scope of Commons, that is, encyclopedic value and good photo technique. --Tomascastelazo 23:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Is that really the scope of commons? Lycaon 23:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- I quote: "Wikimedia Commons is a freely licensed media file repository (similar to stock photography archives) targeted at other Wikimedia projects." Wikipedia, I think, is an encyclopedic effort. Problem here is that there is sooooo much photography around here that is not appreciated for that value...--Tomascastelazo 23:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Is that really the scope of commons? Lycaon 23:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek 23:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support although I really should stop supporting all th`e pictures of cute little bunny wabbits --Pumpmeup 05:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Vizcachas and wabbits are not really related. Check Wikispecies ;-)). Lycaon 08:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, but they really look like (ugly) rabbits. And Pumpmeup, you really have some wild imagination to find it cute ;) --Nattfodd 08:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice shagger, but this doesnt sweep me of my feet, sorry. Plus Ack Digon. --Richard Bartz 15:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj 19:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Aracuanotalk 10:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Digitaldreamer 18:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Ahonc 14:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs 07:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Qu'il est mignon le mossieur ! (au passage, les critiques sur les parties "impressionnistes" que j'ai faites sur ta photo du bas sont valables ici, pourquoi ces étranges couleurs qui bavent un peu ??) -- Benh 17:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Cecil 05:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)