Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:BlackstoneReflection1.jpg

Image:BlackstoneReflection1.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Common-Pics - uploaded by Common-Pics - nominated by Common-Pics -- Common-Pics 22:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Common-Pics 22:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, of a lack of needed quality.--- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 01:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Although I will not support this picture, you should be more specific when you put up a FPX template (what is the quality problem? exposition, focus, depth of field, white balance?). Even here, I think composition rather than quality is the problem. --S23678 (talk) 04:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  • It was a slip of the mind; the composition is, as you say, the main issue here. - Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Deleted FPX, IHMO this image is not so bad qaulity, same meaning as S23678. --Karelj (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Restored FPX (contested) --Romwriter (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose What does the photographer want to tell us with this picture? --Romwriter (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  • This? ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like it... --RoFra (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
  • although i agree, this type of comment is of no help to the submiter in improving Ianare (talk) 05:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose unsharp, would be better without paved surface showing, IMO Ianare (talk) 05:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose no Wow. not particularly good quality at high res. Anonymous101 ^talk 14:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

result: 2 supports, 5 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)