Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bird on Wire.jpg

Image:Bird on Wire.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by Carlos Baquero - uploaded by Dake - nominated by Dake -- 17:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Dake 17:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC) nb. I had some doubts about the colors but it seems these mountains have actually such an intense hue : http://flickr.com/photos/baquero/42099912/ -- Dake 17:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurry bird, no name (it is an Alpine Chough (Pyrrhocorax graculus), btw) -- Lycaon 18:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

  picture description fixed, thanks. Dake 22:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

•  Support The depth of field is such that the background is in focus, and the bird is out of focus. Gets my vote anyroad -- Gordo 20:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • that's because the rock was not moving ;-) Lycaon 21:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree, it's not a question of focus because the cable is focused. Blame the bird! -- Alvesgaspar 12:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting moment and impressive background, but subject is blurry and tiny and composition looks unbalanced. Francisco M. Marzoa 22:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I like it despite the lack of focus on the bird because it gives the feeling of wind ruffling the feathers. Dori | Talk 22:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of sharpness of bird --MichaelMaggs 07:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Nice pic, with nice background //Moralist 18:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose The shift of focus on the background while leaving the bird unfocused is too radical for my tastes, especially if you were to use this on Wikipedia.--HereToHelp (talk) 02:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment Images and sounds and video may be used, not just on Wikipedia, but on any other current or future project: this is the Commons! Gordo 07:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I know that. But in any project the bird would still need more focus and detail (unless you'd just want to crop it out and take the rocks...).--HereToHelp (talk) 20:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

4 support, 4 oppose → not featured Roger McLassus 06:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)