Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Abbazia di Sant'Antimo - 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Abbazia di Sant'Antimo - 01.jpg, not featured
[edit]Info created by Dongio - uploaded by Dongio - nominated by Dongio --Dongio 21:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Support --Dongio 21:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment Seems a bit tilted. --Digon3 talk 21:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- and now?--Dongio 22:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Oppose - Not a particular interesting picture or composition. Might be QP though.
Husky (talk to me) 22:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Oppose not even QI due to tilt. --Leafnode 23:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Support tilt/persp. fixed, so change of vote --Leafnode 08:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Oppose A bit tilt, there isn't high detail. --Beyond silence 08:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- reason?
Neutral I think it is a nice composition. In my opinion a nice picture for QI. --AngMoKio 11:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a nice picture for QI. QI should be technically flawless, and tilt is very big error in this particular example --Leafnode 19:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- But now is always tilt? :-) --Dongio 20:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a nice picture for QI. QI should be technically flawless, and tilt is very big error in this particular example --Leafnode 19:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Che cosa vuoi dire (e' pendente)? Non puoi ruotarla? Dori - Talk 03:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Dicevo, è ancora pendente? l'ho già ruotata rispetto all'originale, e se ora tracci una riga verticale sul lato del campanile, vedrai che non è più pendente... oppure deve pendere verso sinistra per effetto della prospettiva? --Dongio 06:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the building is leaning to the back. Rotation won't help - it's perespective disortion. --Leafnode 07:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- ma se è una distorsione della prospettiva, cosa si può fare? vuol dire che la fotografia è fatta male? ...ma la prospettiva esiste... --Dongio 14:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've checked full image on photoshop using guidelines - now it looks OK, I've changed my vote. About your question: perspective errors are made mainly because of bad photographer's position. When you make photo from place close to the base of building, it's natural that you point your camera upward. This is how 'frog perspective' is made. While it may be OK to use it as artistic measure, this is not very good way to depict buildings --Leafnode 08:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- ma se è una distorsione della prospettiva, cosa si può fare? vuol dire che la fotografia è fatta male? ...ma la prospettiva esiste... --Dongio 14:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the building is leaning to the back. Rotation won't help - it's perespective disortion. --Leafnode 07:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment Thumbnail doesn't seem up to date. I think tilt is corrected but would prefer it with warmer colours. Is it worth editing it again ? Benh 21:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 08:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)