Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:061212-nordkapp.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:061212-nordkapp.jpg - not featured
[edit]- Info created by Cascoly - uploaded by Cascoly -nominated by Cascoly -- Cascoly 19:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Cascoly 19:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support very nice composition. The wider aspect ratio fits very well to the scene. --AngMoKio 20:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support A well executed panorama with a good composition. Chmehl 22:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer 22:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis 23:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose-- possible copyright violation, clear assertion at source All images are copyrighted by Steve Estvanik. Except for these links, you may NOT copy any of these images unless you pay for a download Gnangarra 14:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)- uploader has been advised about this concern with instructions on how to rectify it on their talk page, Gnangarra 14:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- withdrawn oppose now Support copyright issue resolvable Gnangarra 01:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- uploader has been advised about this concern with instructions on how to rectify it on their talk page, Gnangarra 14:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Commentsorry, but this uploader cannot find any instructions - it just takes me to pp that describe what's happening, but never tells me how i can clear this up - i AM the copyrigt holder and thought i had already declared that when i submitted the image saying that i was? the source noted is also my domain - pix-now.com and all images there are mine. this image is a version of one on that site that i am releasing with the license indicated Cascoly 20:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I think the nominator is right. See the deletion request for details -- Slaunger 21:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment (Off-topic). Heh, I've seen that ship (MS Fram) before, but that was at the other pole! -- Slaunger 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment (Off-topic) the Fram's a new ship, this one was launched about 10 years ago and is a bit smaller. Cascoly 20:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, it looked very similar. I had read somewhere that MS Fram was also cruising near Antarctica at the other half-season, thus my hasty (wrong) guess. However, the image name also contradicts this original assumption. -- Slaunger 21:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment (Off-topic) you do get half-credit -- they run 2 ships in Antarctica - used to be the Nordkapp & NordNorge, but now the Fram is in play too. and thanks for the comments on copyright Cascoly 22:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination resumed, carry on please... -- Alvesgaspar 23:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose --Nice but stitching problems. Sting 11:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Sting --Simonizer 16:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Yep, pretty bad stitching problems. Dead band extending from near the lower left corner and up to the right as evidenced by smudged out/apparently blurred patches. It is a pity as it is a nice scenary. What stitching software did you use (it is always instructive to specify that on the image page)? I recommend to geocode the image. -- Slaunger 19:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Could you show where are the stitching problems please ? from near the lower left corner and up to the right : that means the diagonal ? I do not see any stitching problem along this line ? --B.navez 09:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- OK seen (but I don't call it lower left corner rather lower middle part of the picture)--B.navez 16:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, my description of where the problems are were not that well formulated, my apologies. It seems like you figured out! Maybe "pretty bad" is an overstatement, but if the original photos are still available, I think it should be restitched. -- Slaunger 20:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose --B.navez 16:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please state you reason for opposing the image. Thanks. --Laitche 18:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC) That was the conclusion of my discussion just above.--B.navez 15:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose FRZ 18:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please state you reason for opposing the image. Thanks. --Laitche 18:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
6 support, 5 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 22:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)