Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:X60 Riddarholmen September 2012.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:X60 Riddarholmen September 2012.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2012 at 15:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Composition is a little too busy IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)- Support I like the composition, the wires and all that stuff is not disturbing me, very good technical execution --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose a cut-off train is IMO not a good motive; when making photos of trains it’s generally a good idea to either show the complete train or have its rear visible part covered by some object (a tree for example), but only showing the front part and then having the image cut off is not something a featured picture of a train should normally do. No wow factor either. darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 18:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support I have no objections to the composition. Albertus teolog (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose There are a lot of objects in the background that distracts one's attention from the train. --Korman (talk) 06:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support For me the breaking of the "rules" is what gives this photo its wow. The composition is good. By contrast the somewhat messy background is making the front of the train quite serene and yet powerful. It's a bit like a divine being plunging through the chaos. In this case it's the chaos of the bottle-neck at Riddarholmen in Stockholm. -- Achird (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support The slightly out focused background is not disturbing me in larger view. The composition (coming in-to-the-frame) and the 3D feel (thanks again for the choice of big aperture) give me a big wow. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Per Jkadavoor. Kleuske (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
