Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wrocław Główny (Breslau Hauptbahnhof) by night.JPG

File:Wrocław Główny (Breslau Hauptbahnhof) by night.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2015 at 14:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wrocław Główny (Breslau Hauptbahnhof) by night.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wrocław Główny (Breslau Hauptbahnhof) by night.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Fascinating angle on a lovely old train shed. A bit distorted and unsharp near the left edge, and the signals are a little posterized, but as I so often say I don't think that's enough to ruin this. Daniel Case (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support  Neutral Quality is OK for me and I like this empty and antique-looking mood. --Laitche (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Maybe I was "You cannot see the wood for the trees.". It is an unbalanced composition as DXR mentioned so I've changed my vote to neutral. --Laitche (talk) 12:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support - Ambiance overcomes technical shortcomings. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Nice use of line and perspective. I think the composition would be even better if the point of convergence were a bit further to the right. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Objection I can overlook the modern train at the right side but if the vanishing point were further to the right, that train would appear much more (means they can't crop out the train in this composition) and ruins this mood, just my opinion :) --Laitche (talk) 11:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 10:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:18, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but imo the right side crop is not good. The building either needs some space or should be cut, but this creates an unbalanced composition for me. --DXR (talk) 10:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are hundreds of train station photos on Commons. This one is a QI but not more. Why downsized 2/3? The right hand side isn't very interesting and no people to add interest to make up for this. -- Colin (talk) 19:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per DXR. — Julian H.^✈ 13:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 06:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors