Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wild flowers and errosion in Pacifica 1.jpg

File:Wild flowers and errosion in Pacifica 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 15:22:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wild flowers and errosion in Pacifica 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wild flowers and errosion in Pacifica 1.jpg

2050

2155

416

357

3208

4444

blurred area

1827

1308

579

416

3208

4444

blurred area

•  Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry Mila, the idea is great, it reminds me at your octupus and lighthouse picture. But sadly there are several stitching errors (maybe caused by the different focus points) over the whole image and the distorted houses are also not so nice. The composition and colours are really good, but maybe a single shot with a short focal length and less errors would be better. bg mathias K 16:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really like this picture, unfortunately, Leviathan is right. There are many blurred areas in the photo. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, at least some of the blurred area are not due to stitching errors, originals have the same problem. This was one hard to take image. I've no problems with your opposes, so, nothing to be sorry about . I wanted to show the contrast between the spring flowers and disaster. Both were caused by rains. Of course the erosion was also due to waves action.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose support comment The High Fin Sperm Whale. Ggia (talk) 10:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Avala (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Alt 1

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Could you specify which island this was one and possibly geocode? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

It is not an island. It is mainland US, w:Pacifica, California. I added geolocation, and please do not tell me that you are going to oppose the image anyway. Just kidding --Mbz1 (talk) 19:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

I fixed blurred areas. Please take another look.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice composition with contrast between flowers and ocean --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose stay too many siwiched error --Croucrou (talk) 10:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I will try to fix some later today.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Fixed again.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Still a few blurring problems, but I think it's good enough now. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Abstain I'm sorry this image was already a Quality Image Candidate in april 2010,15, and was declined after a consensual review if I'm not wrong. I don't see here any improvement justifying a promotion as "Featured Picture"...--Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

It is an absolutely different version that should be reviewed again. The stitching errors were fixed. If you see some, please point them out, but do not oppose because an old image was opposed. --Mbz1 (talk) 11:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
That was only for the complete information of reviewers... I remove my oppose because if I remember well I didn't vote nor oppose at the time, but I cannot support because, as I said, "I don't see here any improvement justifying a promotion as "Featured Picture" ". Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

You are absolutely welcome to oppose, but there are many improvements. All stitching errors were fixed.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

I respectfully think it would have been fair to say that it is another version of a previous nomination in QIC...--Jebulon (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

You are right, but QI got opposed because it had stitching errors. The new image does not.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Ggia (talk) 10:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Avala (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)