Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg

File:White-throated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2017 at 14:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg

10

1542

479

500

5456

3064

distracting lightflare

• Category:Halcyon smyrnensis Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
•  Info created by Satdeep Gill - uploaded by Satdeep Gill - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image size and quality, maybe some minimal problem with severals lightflare distracting. BTW, I applied a noise reduction in the background --The Photographer 16:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I am envious! I have tried so much to photograph Kingfishers and I get nothing like this! Congrats! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful bird. dllu (t,c) 01:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Just a little soft on part of the beak at full size, but full size is very large, indeed. Overall, quite a great bird picture, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 09:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Bill not great, but the rest is very good. Charles (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

•  OpposeWhen this was submitted as VI, I noticed colours are not true, so have changed my vote. Charles (talk) 13:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Satdeep Gill, one request: This is a white-throated kingfisher, right? Please make sure the filename reflects that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: IMHO the filename already says White-throated Kingfisher. What changes do you suggest ? Should I change it to just the name of the bird ? --Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment It says "White-thorated Kingfisher". -- 16:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Question Good picture, but: The name says, this is a White-throated (not thorated as in the file name) Kingfisher , and all the pictures I found show a white throat. This picture shows a "Yellow-throated" Kingfisher, so I wonder wether the colours are correct --Llez (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose WB is far too warm -- Thennicke (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Thennicke. The perch doesn't look like anything found in nature either, and that bugs me. lNeverCry 09:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose As stated and pointed out above --Llez (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support for the white balance is corrected --Llez (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is good image, but need some more light + desaturate (or lower color temp). --Mile (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC) P.S. I would still add some light (exposure).
•  Comment  Done I have fixed the WB of the image. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 01:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds