Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 22-24 HDR.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 21:12:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Blue hour view of Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain. Nuévalos is a small village with 384 inhabitants, a touristic center in Aragón due to the neighbouring Monasterio de Piedra. All by me, Poco2 21:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 21:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but for me the main subject is a bit small, and the background being (in many parts) a greyish blue-black blob doesn't really help. In a composition like this, I would either focus primarily on the subject, or have the background lead into the subject (yes, the clouds have this nice effect, but the mountains on the two sides distract from the center because of how light and hazy they are). From Google Street View, I see that you took the picture towards the southwest; in general, blue hour photos taken away from the sun have better clarity than photos taken into the sun. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)- Support Good review KoH, but to me the whole thing works :) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support To me, just a nice combination of colors, shapes and light. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support the picture does work indeed! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Question Time info (14:53:03) is correct? It is blue hour view as above info. --Laitche (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)- Oppose sorry, per King of Hearts (weak prescence of the subject in the photo). The amount of chroma noise reduction isn't ideal either, but that may be unavoidable (and the resolution is really good for such a shot). — Julian H.✈ 12:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose per Daniel Case and beautiful blue but the details and image quality are a bit unacceptable for FP (maybe per Julian), a pity. --Laitche (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose That strange blue tide on the bottom is actually bigger than the main subject. This doesn't work for me. -- Pofka (talk) 16:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl (talk) 09:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Big wow but quality just ok on the sky and a bit too much of blue areas IMO, I think a little crop at bottom (200px) and at top (200px too) could help for to give more delph in the image and more attention on the city/town. -- Christian Ferrer 09:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Poco2 12:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)- Poco, would you consider a square crop of the central village, with perhaps a very small amount off top & bottom? Sorry I didn't see this nom earlier. -- Colin (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Colin: are you suggesting that I just upload and alternative or that I re-nominate that new version? Poco2 18:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- It would be a valid alt, but this nomination is a bit negative, so perhaps it stands more chance with a renomination at a future date. -- Colin (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- I can try that somewhen, thanks. Poco2 18:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- It would be a valid alt, but this nomination is a bit negative, so perhaps it stands more chance with a renomination at a future date. -- Colin (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
