Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 108-114 PAN.jpg

File:Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 108-114 PAN.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2017 at 18:40:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 108-114 PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 108-114 PAN.jpg

6320

3317

3972

1032

22602

4393

walls are straight here

20115

2482

285

637

22465

4393

Stiching error

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info Panoramic view of Baku, capital of Azerbaijan. Poco² 18:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 18:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Maybe more sky than necessary, but there are lots of interesting things to look at in full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral The stitching errors noted need to be fixed.  Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  Daniel:  Done and thanks to Ivar for the notes Poco² 21:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment but why choose such a miserable day? Charles (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  Good question Charles, actually I ordered good weather for the phototour, but they didn't listen to me :) Poco² 21:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

• perhaps you can go back and take the same photos when the Caspian Waterfront Development is complete... Charles (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

• And who guarantees good weather? :) Poco² 10:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Charles. The light is flat and unattractive. lNeverCry 03:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I think this is a very valid point. I still think it's featurable, because it's such a huge, sharp panorama with interesting things to see, and not every photo needs to be of a sunny day or some amazing cloud formations. But it is definitely a valid point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support per Ikan. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Ivar, the last stitching issues you noted are now addressed, thank you Poco² 16:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment There is a vertical straight near the right border. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

  True, Christian,  fixed now Poco² 09:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Fine. I appreciate this view. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Je-str: I just fixed the stitching error you noted Poco² 22:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Too much sky and not enough ground -- Thennicke (talk) 01:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I think it's possible people are opposing this photo or declining to vote for it because it isn't one of Poco's best panoramas. And that might be a legitimate reason to oppose it, actually. In other words, maybe we're spoiled, or maybe you (that is, Poco) helped set a new standard for what a featured stitched landscape/cityscape panorama is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

  Not sure about that, Ikan, I don't believe that I'm setting any standards. When I observed this panorama I enjoyed it a lot but the result was just not what I expected, maybe the weather, the construction sites, the architecture, not sure. Poco² 19:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination Poco² 19:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 01:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)