Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg

File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 07:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
•  Info Close up shot with a drone of the sculpture of the iconic Mexican Independence Monument. Created by ProtoplasmaKid - uploaded by ProtoplasmaKid - nominated by ProtoplasmaKid -- ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 07:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

• Hola Iván, I see potential for FP but you need to fix at least 2 issues: the strong chroma noise (probably as the result of having lifted up the shadows) and the red halo around the sculpture. Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you very much for your help, Diego! I have fixed as much as possible now the chroma and removed the halo you mention. Hopefully this will improve. Regards, ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

• To be honest, I had expected improvements in the original picture, not a different one, but as they are pretty similar I have no problem with that. The noise level is good in the current version and I also prefer the POV/angle in this version. The halo is overcorrected so that you can see a grey halo around the statue but in the inner side with no saturation. I also agree with the lighting comments. I prefered the lighting of the original version and the WB too. I'd weak support if you fix the halo and brigthen it a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks Diego! Yeah I think I added too much WB change of color trying to avoid the red halo. Maybe the next time! :) ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Noisy and distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak support: background is impossible to avoid, but light could be better. Still, impressive enough. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support, per Cosmonaut. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Average at best. Composition and technicality could be better. Wolverine XI 15:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I think this was a really good try but I'm not sure the light was particularly kind to you. Keep trying though, good effort for (I think) your first nomination Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks! It's really challenging! I think I can try again having a different lightday. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose I think the buildings behind them are quite disturbing to the sculptures.Jiyoon Leee (talk) 04:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just an average picture with unacceptably distracting background Chepry (talk) 09:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  Just an average comment also with no little intention of being collegial. Thanks anyway. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  Keep it cool, please; don't make frivolous accusations as that will only further escalate things. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose You could avoid the distracting background by positionning the drone differently -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)