Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vale dos Deuses.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Vale dos Deuses.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2016 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by Shooterb9 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)- Support Gorgeous atmosphere. There's some unsharpness, but since most of the background is obscured by haze anyways, to me it's not a huge deal. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per King. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 05:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Is it just me or is there in fact quite a lot of unsharpness, noise, etc.? Possibly badly overprocessed... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)- Support Per King of Hearts. There's a bit of chromatic aberration on the grass in the near right corner, but that's a small part of the picture and I can see it only at full size. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Indeed a very nice pic and mood, but due to denoising or whatever unsharp. Where is the location? Please add. -- -donald- (talk) 08:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Absolutely fo Martin,very sorry but is real overprocessed --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice mood, but strong chromatic noise in the shadowed parts (please see note)--Jebulon (talk) 09:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment to @Martin Falbisoner, -donald-, Livioandronico2013, and Jebulon: Thanks for all comments. It's fixable? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm afraid the chroma noise is too strong to be corrected, in my opinion. One should denoise again, and...the picture will look posterized.--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- per Jebulon --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm afraid the chroma noise is too strong to be corrected, in my opinion. One should denoise again, and...the picture will look posterized.--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose poor quality. -- RTA 12:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
