Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg

File:Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2012 at 05:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg

•  Info The old University mill on the Fyris River in central Uppsala housing the county museum of Uppsala County. The exterior of the building was used by Ingmar Bergman for the bishop's house in the film Fanny and Alexander. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment White balance looks a bit blue, especially for something taken in late afternoon. Also, the trees at the very far left have some pure black, so if you processed it from RAW, I would reduce the blacks a bit. Otherwise very good. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks your your comments.--ArildV (talk) 06:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
    •  Support Very beautiful. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:55, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 16:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --JDP90 (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 04:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 10:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful autumnal picture, but the shadow cast over the lower portion of the building spoils an otherwise perfect composition. --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 13:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very nice, but I'm a bit disapointed by the crop of the reflection of the tree in the water. Shortly: better (IMO) with less sky above, and more water below. However, if I don't support, I don't oppose.--Jebulon (talk) 14:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks your your comments.I dont think it was possible to get the whole tree. The river is narrow, and the river bank is not straight. The image is cropped at the left edge, otherwise it would have been disturbing plants (and parts of the river bank) in the foreground. See also the old photo (much more vegetation today) and Google map. Regards--ArildV (talk) 18:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Thank you for explanations. I understand.--Jebulon (talk) 09:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:47, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Pine^✉ 04:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
• nice, but there is a dust spot --sfu (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Dust spot removed.--ArildV (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
    •  Support --sfu (talk) 11:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:29, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture