Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Belvedere LCD-toneedit2 NR.jpg

File:Upper Belvedere LCD-toneedit2 NR.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2013 at 08:50:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Belvedere LCD-toneedit2 NR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Belvedere LCD-toneedit2 NR.jpg

3970

2279

392

346

5604

3736

What is that?

1401

2195

355

299

5604

3736

Unknown arrows?

•  Info created by Murdockcrc - uploaded by Murdockcrc - nominated by Alborzagros -- Alborzagros (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose: Nice, but has posterization in dark areas (esp. bushes on the left). --Julian H. (talk/files) 16:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice, especially the mood and the colours of water + sky. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment What are those black arrows? Tomer T (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

  Like those star-shape settings, they are surely for 2011 Christmas event. I think they're for fireworks. --Naturehead (talk) 11:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

• Weak  Support. Very nice, but quality defects per Julian. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support-- Peter23 (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose noise reduction too visible in the sky (artifacts), unsharp building at the sides (esp. on the right) and per Julian Herzog (but the posterization is a minor problem IMHO). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- See annotations -- Arcalino (talk) 08:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

  The question in the annotations has been answered above. They are probably firework launch sticks and their reflections in the water. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry for my inattention, change to  Neutral, the firework launch sticks are disturbing this very nice composition --Arcalino (talk) 11:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Image quality is just not good enough. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)