Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USS Johnston (DD-557) underway on 27 October 1943 (NH 63495).jpg

File:USS Johnston (DD-557) underway on 27 October 1943 (NH 63495).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 16:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:USS Johnston (DD-557) underway on 27 October 1943 (NH 63495).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USS Johnston (DD-557) underway on 27 October 1943 (NH 63495).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
•  Info Unidentified U.S. Navy photographer - restored by Adam Cuerden with text removal presumed to be by User:Cobatfor - uploaded and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Info I am so lucky to have a loving, supportive family with enough money to give me a new laptop as an early birthday gift. This was my testing out of it. It went... well. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment That's wonderful! Happy Birthday! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451097 05:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I've been staring at this for a while now, feeling that something was off about the contrast. I was not sure what it was, and I still am not 100% certain. Looking at the original helped a bit though. The original is a very high contrast image, where large parts of the subject are quite dark due to the direction of the sun relative to the ship. In the retouched version, the shadows have been brightened a bit, making things a bit more visible. But somehow, my brain refuses to find this realistic or credible, possibly because there is still so much evidence for hard shadows around. Given that brightening the shadows did not actually reveal anything new in the image, I'd very much prefer the unaltered original (minus the dust spots). However, I'd still not vote for it, because in my opinion, it is not a particularly stunning photograph to start with. --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

As the first thing I did after the computer switch, I fear what's uploaded is what's available. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Quite an interesting restoration. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)