Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre Belém April 2009-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2009 at 17:28:34

Info The Tower of Belém was built in the 16th century, under King Manuel I, to commemorate the expedition of Vasco da Gama to India. It is located in Lisbon, close to the Monastery of Jerónimos and to the Monument to the Portuguese Discoveries. Everything by -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ahnode (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Centered composition does not work for me --Muhammad (talk) 03:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Upon further consideration, not enough of a reason to oppose. --Muhammad (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Notyourbroom (talk) 03:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --Farzaaaad2000 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I quite enjoy this image. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like it. Tight crop on the bottom is suboptimal --Richard Bartz (talk) 13:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That is difficult to avoid due to the presence of a low wall surrounding the area (but you know of it, of course!) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addition - Without tide the viewpoint wouldn't be bad, btw. nice clone twins you have - noticed at the last four visitors on the left side

Yeah, there was a congress on identical twins running that day. Join the joys of stitching panoramas with moving subjets! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Oppose I agree with Richard Bartz. —kallerna™ 13:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree with Richard --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose with regrets, obvious horizontal stitch line esp. visible on the left-hand wall of the tower, whose top half is greyer and bottom half is pinker... (look at the railing of the balcony there...)--JY REHBY (discuter) 02:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done -- Quite right, the stitching line was fixed. But there are also variations in the colour of the stone -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support then, thanks --JY REHBY (discuter) 13:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's very nice --S23678 (talk) 03:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose clone twins / stitching mistake see crop (by de:Benutzer:Devilsanddust) --Umschattiger (talk) 12:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Luminosity is not the best. Most likely due to the partially overcast day. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improved version above, where the issues raised here were addressed -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => withdrawn Maedin\^talk 15:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu