Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thun vs Lausanne-IMG 0177.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Thun vs Lausanne-IMG 0177.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2011 at 23:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info FC Thun vs FC Lausanne on 23 of October 2011: Dennis Hediger (17) showing it's not his fault if Jocelyn Roux (9) performs loopings during the match. Created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch. A bit unsharp, but this is understandable. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Stryn (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Oppose downsampled.Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 09:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)- It can be also simply a crop!? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Rather unlikely if noticing the standard resolution of 5.616 pixel × 3.744 pixel and comparing it to the current resolution. Correct me if I'm wrong, Rama. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 15:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- I know it from my own images: I use very often a crop! And 300mm can't be enough in a soccer stadium. I think that image is simply a crop for a better composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- It is a crop. 300mm gives a wider field of view at that distance. -- Rama (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral Thanks for pointing that out, Rama. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- It is a crop. 300mm gives a wider field of view at that distance. -- Rama (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- I know it from my own images: I use very often a crop! And 300mm can't be enough in a soccer stadium. I think that image is simply a crop for a better composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Rather unlikely if noticing the standard resolution of 5.616 pixel × 3.744 pixel and comparing it to the current resolution. Correct me if I'm wrong, Rama. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 15:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- It can be also simply a crop!? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose bad background.--Claus (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 12 November 2011 (UTC)