Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Sun and Steam Phase eruption of Castle Geyser.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:The Sun and Steam Phase eruption of Castle Geyser.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2009 at 20:09:47
- InfoThe w:Sun and w:steam phase eruption of w:Castle Geyser in w:Yellowstone National Park
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks kinda mystic. Still, it's too dark and alternative 1 is better. —kallerna™ 21:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose JalalV (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Alternative 1, featured
[edit]- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support I'm hesitating with this one and the Alternative 2. Anyway I'm not expert on that, but I'll say the picture looks great for the circumstance. --Acarpentier 15:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Best one of these, it just needs to cropped. —kallerna™ 21:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- If the image is cut on the left hand side I would cut the person. I believe it is important to have a person in the image to show the size of the eruption.If I cut on the right hand side I would lose other steams, that show how Geyser Basin looks on early, cool mornings. What do you think? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think it should not be cropped. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- If the image is cut on the left hand side I would cut the person. I believe it is important to have a person in the image to show the size of the eruption.If I cut on the right hand side I would lose other steams, that show how Geyser Basin looks on early, cool mornings. What do you think? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support really exciting for me and very good picture --Böhringer (talk) 22:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Karel (talk) 12:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Alternative 1 has a real sense of drama, compared with which the original and Alternative 2 are bland. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilted CW - under & overexposed. I like the current FP much more --Richard Bartz (talk) 14:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As Richard Bartz. Much prefer current FP of the same subject. JalalV (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Quite a dramatic effect. This picture has a balanced composition not matched by the 2 alternatives. --S23678 (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Ö 11:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Alternative 2, not featured
[edit]- Info Please notice that the steam from the eruption casting w:shadows (left hand side) and w:crepuscular rays (right hand side) on itself.
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose see above -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose JalalV (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)