Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tbriz guy machid.jpg

File:Tbriz guy machid.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2021 at 04:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tbriz guy machid.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tbriz guy machid.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
•  Info created and uploaded by Hameddaeipic - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Very nice, but there's magenta CA at the limits of the direct sunlight on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but highlights blown, not fixable. I can't see how this made QI. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I wasn't the one who evaluated it at QIC, and had I been, I would have asked for the CA to be fixed, but I think some viewers are OK with sunlight being blown in a larger context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Commonists 22:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. --Cart (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• Since there's now a 2nd vote for a photo with uncorrected CA, I must  Oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment @Ikan Kekek and Basotxerri: I tried to correct the CA several times but the end result was not good, I don't know if it is due to image incorrigibility or just my poor skill. Because there is other support besides myself I am not withdrawing at the moment to hear more comments about it. --IamMM (talk) 02:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for trying. Side point: This photo should be renamed after the nomination is over because Tabriz is misspelled. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I will try my luck with these CAs, too … --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC) But it’s a difficult case, because the CA colours (red, bluish green) are very similar to the colours of the brick stone and of the ornaments. So I ask for your patience … --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @IamMM and Ikan Kekek: I have reduced the CAs in the lower part, especially at the high contrast borders in the lower left. (And I have set the colour profile, it was undefined; I guess this is just sRGB.) There are still some CAs near the top border, they are even harder to fix because of the low colour contrast. I will try that later, but for now I hope that this version is at least a bit better. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Huge improvement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Aristeas, it has improved significantly now. IamMM (talk) 16:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The clipped whites don't bother me as long as I don't pixel peep it but look at the pictures as a whole. - Benh (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality image, but nothning special for FP nominatin, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 17:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran