Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tamarin portrait.JPG

File:Tamarin portrait.JPG, not featured

Voting period ends on 3 May 2009 at 15:21:13

•  Info The image was taken in SF Zoo. The Tamarins were behind the glass. The glass could not be approached closer than 4 meters because the Tamarins had young File:Emperor Tamarin with babies sf.JPG. BTW the pictured Tamarin is female. I know because in Tamarins males are the ones, who have babies on their backs.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Info created, uploaded by and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support it is quite a fascinating creature, strange that it was named after the German emperor --Zakharii 15:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Maybe the German moustaches of the time had something to do with it? :P Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

looks more chinese .. --Richard Bartz (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Nice --Muhammad (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose in my opinion flashlight is too harsh and the DOF is too low. Composition is soso. Sorry. --AngMoKio (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Info They are fast moving monkey that hardly sit in one place more than a 1/10 of a second. They were behind the glass with a very, very strong reflection. Here's the image of a visitor touching the glass that is absolutely prohibited to do BTW, but you could see the reflection there. The nominated image is a portrait. What composition a portrait could have? --Mbz1 (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I understand that those were difficult conditions. A portrait can have many different compositions. Portrait just means that a person or in this case an animal is the main object in the pic. --AngMoKio (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —Notyourbroom (talk) 01:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not too fond of the light and the crop. Lycaon (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lighting isn't very good, composition is average. Please add a location info to the image description. --Richard Bartz (talk) 09:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Richard,
May I please ask you what is your mood today? I'm asking not because you opposed few of my images (that's fine. I'm always happy, when you pay attention to my images even if this attention results in opposing), but because you asked me to provide a location for an image which is clearly specified at this very nomination as taken in SF ZOO. You did not seem to be interested in the location while supporting few of Luc nominations.You did not even bother to ask what Zoo the images were taken at. Maybe you ask for the location only for the images that you are opposing. Is that it? I mean I understand why AngMoKio asked for the phone number for the beautiful woman, but asking to provide the location for a monkey in a cage... Well, Richard, just for you I added location for my image. Sorry, I could not direct you to the exact cage. :) --Mbz1 (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for asking me - my mood is markedly well since spring has arrived Munich at full tilt. Sometimes I forget to ask for the location but thank you for finally adding the location to the description. Regarding opposes - I think it is important to hold onto our FP claim in delivering the best of the best commons has to offer, which I think only less people awares at the moment. FPC is turning into QIC - I cant't admit that - nobody should. Rise up FPC! --Richard Bartz

Discussion about my oppose vote is moved to here --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose cute fella, but DOF is to low, detail is lacking. Certainly a good picture, but I don't see it being up there with the excellent ones. --Dschwen (talk) 22:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Berthold Werner (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)