Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Suur Taevaskoda 2010 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Suur Taevaskoda 2010 01.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2013 at 11:38:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created and uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 11:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 11:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Support I like it.--XRay talk 17:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Not enough wow to me and there seems to be some green CA. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment This is the best known Devonian sandstone (416–359 MY old) outcrop in Estonia during wintertime. Outcrop raises up to 22,5 meetres higher from the surface of Ahja river and the total topographic prominence is 38 m. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. Even with the explanation above, I don't know what I'm looking at. Pleclown (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Support St1995 15:37, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No wow, as noted. Obviously a lot of effort went into making this, but that doesn't make it an FP. If the subject of the photo is the sandstone, then we need to be a lot closer to it and not see all the snowy trees. And what, exactly, is revealed in wintertime that wouldn't be in a summer photo? Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment Many Estonians have been there on summertime, hardly no-one in winter. So it definitely gives this outcrop a fresh look. Being closer would had not made it possible to capture all of this. If it is a photo about the place, then why to capture only the sandstone? Kruusamägi (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's a fresh look, no doubt, but that doesn't automatically make it an FP. So is this photo about the place or the sandstone? You said one thing up top and another thing down here. If you can't decide what the subject of this picture is, how will most other viewers (like myself) who've never been there? Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- It is about the place. If it would be only about the sandstone, then only the sandstone would be on the image. And summer is by far a better time to capture the sandstone there due to better light contitions. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's a fresh look, no doubt, but that doesn't automatically make it an FP. So is this photo about the place or the sandstone? You said one thing up top and another thing down here. If you can't decide what the subject of this picture is, how will most other viewers (like myself) who've never been there? Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)