Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spider November 2010-6.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2010 at 23:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A Garden Spider waiting for prey. Notice the signal thread atached to its leg (and to the web). Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)- Support--Jebulon (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Neutral Wonderful detail, but the composition seems too central to me. Cropping some of the blackness on the right, e.g. to make the lower right corner meet the extended signal thread diagonal, would help it I think. --Avenue (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)- Support--Miguel Bugallo 01:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Detailed and interesting, but the composition is too centered (needs use of "rule of thirds"). Also, the flash seems to cast quite harsh shadows, especially off of the top leaf, adding to a distracting background. Sorry. - LeavXC (talk) 04:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)- Oppose -- Bence detaylı değil. Ayrıca bazı teknik hatalar mevcut. Mulazimoglu (talk) 07:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- Google translation:"I think it is not detailed. Also present some technical errors".
Question - Where is the detail missing and what technical errors are you refering to? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- The details of the animal is not so good. Also the leaf is not clear. And the animal is just in the center. The picture totaly has no wow factor. Mulazimoglu (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Focus is correct, lighting of the subject is excellent. This is a FP. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo. With a bit more strong crop could be outstanding composition with clear diagonal line. IMO, approximately 240 - 250 px at right crop needed. However, i like this photo "as is" too --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition seems a bit messy to me. In particular the upper leaf edge and shadow. --99of9 (talk) 09:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Hard dark shadow from flash kills it for me. --Niabot (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I agree with the criticism about the leaf edge and shadows, and drop this nom (although it might still have a fair chance of promotion). An improved version will be nominated above -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
