Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Smogorówka Dolistowska - rainbow.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Smogorówka Dolistowska - rainbow.JPG, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2015 at 22:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)- Support Lovely --LivioAndronico talk 22:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support per Livio, miss the exif... --Laitche (talk) 03:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but nothing that I'd call extraordinary. The buildings are just that, buildings without anything special and the partial rainbow is pretty but the result is not at FP level to me, sorry. Poco2 12:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
*
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. Rainbow is not striking enough to offset ordinariness of buildings and flat land. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per other opposers. --Cayambe (talk) 08:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Comment I think this is good landscape photo with nice light and the colors, the rainbow is also important factor in this photo but it's like kind of a garnish or decoration so partial rainbow is no problem for me :) --Laitche (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)- Support per Laitche --Tremonist (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Conditional oppose No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile: Windows and Mac browsers and apps treat colors randomly (even on a calibrated monitor). -- Slaunger (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Info Demoted to 'not featured' due to sock double vote. 4 October 2018. --Cart (talk) 22:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
