Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Slices of rocks, Karystos, Euboea, Greece.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Slices of rocks, Karystos, Euboea, Greece.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2016 at 21:36:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
I withdraw my nomination--Jebulon (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Support Strange rock formation of "slices" of white marble, beach near Karystos, Euboea, Greece. -- Jebulon (talk) 21:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)- Support Gorgeous rocks! So many shades of almost pure white, quite an achievement to capture them. cart-Talk 21:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 21:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Neutral harsh contrast --The Photographer (talk) 23:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)- Support I would make some sort of pun on "sedimentary", except marbles are metamorphic and I can't think of any good puns on that one right now. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, but the light is very harsh, as already The Photographer mentioned and the screen layout look very random and ordinary for me. The horizon line on top almost not visible but however visibly look very unusual. For sure: the this rocks are a interesting motive and very viewable. But can`t see that the rocks are put in a lowly and worth seeing way. --Alabasterstein (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I had already darkened the rocks a bit. There is no overexposition, and nos details are lost. When something is white, it is white... The horizon line: this is to show where horizontality stays, and therefore how strange are these rocks.--Jebulon (talk) 08:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks for review and interest anyway !--Jebulon (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I understand the motive: the rocks was/is the main object of this image. So the horizon line is rather irrelevant. We have not a geographical dominated photo, where you want to show the viewer a part of the coastal line. --Alabasterstein (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your opinion, which is not mine, as you imagine.--Jebulon (talk) 09:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I understand the motive: the rocks was/is the main object of this image. So the horizon line is rather irrelevant. We have not a geographical dominated photo, where you want to show the viewer a part of the coastal line. --Alabasterstein (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I had already darkened the rocks a bit. There is no overexposition, and nos details are lost. When something is white, it is white... The horizon line: this is to show where horizontality stays, and therefore how strange are these rocks.--Jebulon (talk) 08:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks for review and interest anyway !--Jebulon (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Still harsh light, shallow DOF, and in general not very special --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose That sky above. Sea should be "inside". --Mile (talk) 10:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Time to I withdraw my nomination, I think. Thanks !--Jebulon (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 20:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
