Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ShiFengWaterFall 002.jpg

File:ShiFengWaterFall 002.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2012 at 23:31:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ShiFengWaterFall 002.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ShiFengWaterFall 002.jpg

•  Info created by Weihao.chiu - uploaded by Shizhao - nominated by jsjsjs1111 -- Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose: I really like this one, but it seems to need a little clockwise rotation and the overexposed areas in the waterfall are annoying. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support The only (very minor) peeve i have with this picture, is that i don't like long exposure times that much. It's a beautiful image, though and judging from the top of the waterfall (which should be level) it does not need any rotating. Kleuske (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the too long exposure, I prefer "frozen" (as says Benh) effect for water, but it is matter of taste. Anyway, the strong CA of the trees on the overexposed sky is a no-go to me.--Jebulon (talk) 13:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support as in Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Shifen_waterfall -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support An uncommonly engaging photo – I love the complexity of the composition. SteveStrummer (talk) 05:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Taraxacum (talk) 16:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Would change my vote if the overexposure with visible CA is fixed Poco a poco (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to CA and overexposure of some parts. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposure of some parts --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:51, 17 September 2012 (UTC)