Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt Georgen am Längsee Sankt Martin 1 Filialkirche hl. Martin 12092018 4609.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sankt Georgen am Längsee Sankt Martin 1 Filialkirche hl. Martin 12092018 4609.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 15:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria
Info This is a simple photograph but I find it really beautiful and striking; even the contrail somehow adds something to it. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I'm frankly not sure this is amongst the best. Trivial centered framing and good but common quality in 2020. - Benh (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- I get why the centered framing doesn't appeal, but for me this is one of those pictures that is worth featuring purely because of the beauty of the motif. As you say the image quality is clearly up to scratch anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 21:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support I think the clouds, leading path, and quality make it more than a QI. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment Gallery corrected - this is not Germany but Austria --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- You’re right - an oversight on my part. Thanks for fixing that. Cmao20 (talk) 13:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Although I'm never a fan of churches, I find this elongated roof rather impressive, and the excellent weather conditions finally convince me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose - good image; QI + VI but IMO not enough wow. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)- Weak oppose no wow StellarHalo (talk) 02:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I've to agree with Benh, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per other opposers, truly sorry. --Ivar (talk) 15:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The composition is simple but good, and I am inclined to support, providing that a dust spot a bit to the left of the right margin to the right of about the center of the steeple is edited out. -- Ikan Kekek
Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your review, Ikan. Dust spot was cropped out and a new version was uploaded. —- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
(talk) 04:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice church and good quality, but IMHO not special enough for FPC. For instance, the foreground with the road is IMHO not very appealing (it is fine, but not FP). --Domob (talk) 10:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support, but I marked another dust spot, so please edit that one out, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done @Ikan Kekek: What a shame! There was another dust spot to be cloned out. Thanks for detecting it, Ikan. —- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- You bet. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Domob. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Really sorry Johann Jaritz but I can't see this getting three more supports by midday tomorrow. Plenty of people did think this one was worthy of FP though, so I don't think it was too far off the mark. I promise I'll find another of your pictures to nominate in the next few weeks. Cmao20 (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
