Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Sebastian at night from Monte Urgull.jpg

File:San Sebastian at night from Monte Urgull.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2010 at 18:11:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:San Sebastian at night from Monte Urgull.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Sebastian at night from Monte Urgull.jpg

•  Info created by Nikopol - uploaded by Nikopol - nominated by Patriot8790 -- Patriot8790 (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Info San Sebastian seen at night photographed from Monte Urgull.
•  Support -- Patriot8790 (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --すけ (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the nomination! I just uploaded a version with denoised sky and sea.Nikopol (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support nice look --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Looks a bit tilted CW to me, would support it if corrected --Leuo (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
  •  Support Much better now. --Leuo (talk) 06:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I've looked at this a couple of times now. I like it but I think I agree with Leuo --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

• I´ll look into it when I´m home. Nikopol (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Done The lines are not parallel, but I didn´t want to overdo it since I was afraid to hurt the composition (especially the triangular shape). I think it should be OK now. Nikopol (talk) 15:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Good image now and thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark, too noisy, unsharp. —kallerna™ 14:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Well, in full resolution, light and image quality is not that impressive, but it rarely is in night shots. In 1:1 it looks pretty good, but it does not quite make it over my bar. I suggest you geocode it. Adds value to the image page. --Slaunger (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

• When I started uploading images, I tried it once, failed (though maybe it was just a problem with my firefox), and now I am a little unmotivated. Maybe you now a foolproof tutorial? Yeah, I know I´m lazy ;) Nikopol (talk) 17:43, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

• I found this link made it fairly easy for me to tag my images (works in FF ok). Just point to where you took it and copy the {{location template}} info. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks, I´ll try it some time around! Nikopol (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --.snoopy. 12:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places