Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Pablo Bastion, Castillo de San Marcos.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2016 at 17:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Juliancolton –Juliancolton | Talk 17:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Support –Juliancolton | Talk 17:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)- Support Impressive, I like it. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Julian! So nice to be in a position to interact with you again! And what an image ... the first truly symmetrical building photo I've seen here in a while. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, likewise! I've been doing a lot more photography (and traveling) lately, so I'm hoping to get back into the habit of uploading some of my images here. The only downside to spending a few years learning photography is that now I cringe a little every time I come across one of my earlier uploads! Yikes. Anyway, hope all is well on your end, and thanks for the support. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --cart-Talk 21:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 21:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 23:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Whitebalance, 
Underexposed, too thin down, UFOs, --The Photographer 02:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi The Photographer, I made some minor changes to warm up the WB, boost shadow exposure, and remove the hot pixels in the sky. I deliberately opted for a darker exposure to preserve detail in the original plaster, which is very reflective and tends to blow out. Could you please take another look? –Juliancolton | Talk 14:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Julian, thanks for you improvement and it look better, however, IMHO, the image look too yellow (the main problem and why my oppose vote) and a big porcent of this image is Underexposed. Btw, another detail is the little space from the fort to the grass edge down exactly in the middle. --The Photographer 19:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, I misunderstood! I thought it was too blue. :) Cooled the WB back down and tried a different crop to allow for more room on the bottom. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- You can see what I am trying tell you here --The Photographer 23:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- That's much, much bluer than it looked in reality. I know the warm hues are somewhat unnatural and artificial, but I'd rather keep it close to the actual appearance, right or wrong (and personally I like the complimentary blue/orange tones, from an aesthetic point of view). –Juliancolton | Talk 14:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- NP, remember that it's only MHO --The Photographer 23:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Julian, thanks for you improvement and it look better, however, IMHO, the image look too yellow (the main problem and why my oppose vote) and a big porcent of this image is
- Oppose Its very dull; not giving the beauty of a night view. Jee 03:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Needs at least perspective and/or tilt correction. --Kreuzschnabel 06:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Kreuzschnabel: Is that better? –Juliancolton | Talk 14:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 17:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 06:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 20:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 00:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
