Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Francisco 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:San Francisco 2.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 15:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info 250 Megapixel Panorama of San Francisco from Twinpeaks. You will want to download to your computer to view full (may crash your browser).- Info Created by User:Dschwen - nominated by -- ianaré (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Support The level of detail is amazing. --ianaré (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Dull colors and looks overexposed --Muhammad (talk) 16:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, ok, it is not an oversexed Flickr-Shot, and I did not get around to do proper exposure blending on it yet, as this was done while i was traveling. --Dschwen (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Muhammad. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support I was trying to nominate this picture here when I saw that it was already done... Maybe needs some annotations for famous details (GG Bridge, Alcatraz...)--Jebulon (talk) 22:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, I don't feel that "panorama" equals "FP status". The light is dull, the composition so-so, and parts of the picture are overexposed. --Aqwis (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Comment I don't either, and have voted down panoramas before. But I think in this case the level of technical expertise and simply awe inspiring detail are strong mitigating factors for what are issues largely beyond the photographer's control. --ianaré (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Muhammad. --Avenue (talk) 10:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Encouraging Support This is a hard to take image. If there's good light at the city, there's not so good light on the bridge and other wise. I believe Daniel did a great job under the circumstances to show the city, the bridge, and the bay in one panorama, but I'm missing the fog :)--Mbz1 (talk) 22:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nope. Big is not necessarily beautiful and the image suffers from some serious drawbacks, like the lighting and the composition. If Dschwen himself did not nominate the picture he had certainly his reasons... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- One reason would be that I was traveling across the country... And this comment is actually perverting the concept of self nominations. --Dschwen (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Support OK, maybe the composition is not the finest. But unter the technical view it is one of the most amazing pics ion commons! It´s such a lot of work and no easy "click & go". BG Leviathan (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC) ...ging nie durch San Fransico in zerrissnen Jeans. ;-)
- Oppose Sorry, no wow IMO. —kallerna™ 18:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
