Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruth Muskrat.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ruth Muskrat.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2016 at 23:08:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by the National Photo Company, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support I am not expert in this subject, it's not a alternative nomination and I know that this alteration is destructive, however, my idea is explain you that you could go a litle more to improve the original image maybe fixing focus. --The Photographer 00:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I'd prefer to vote on one image unless the nominator presents an alternate. I also don't like the idea of modernizing a historical image. Now I see that the nominator is talking about changes based on a surprise alternate, and Ikan's vote is under the alternate but mentions the nominator's version. I find this all confusing and off-putting (and intrusive to a good extent), so I'll have to switch to oppose. INeverCry 06:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)- Oppose I'm sorry, but the face is way too blurry for me. --Ivar (talk) 07:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per INeverCry. Present a normal, alt-free, non-double-trippel option nomination, and I'll probably change to 'Support'. cart-Talk 09:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- I see the idea there, but think it goes a fair bit too far, to the point of nnaturalness. I'll poke at it and notify all voters if I make any changes. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support, and I prefer Adam's version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC) - To clarify, I oppose The Photographer's version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per what I say above. Good that there was only one version on Wikipedia. A nice simple nomination that didn't interfere completely with the original. The original photographer didn't have Photoshop or a Canon EOS 7D Mark III, etc... INeverCry 06:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry, but the face is way too blurry for me. --Ivar (talk) 07:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination This nomination has been thoroghly derailed; I'll renominate it later. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /JEFF 08:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
