Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 23:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Prolineserver - uploaded by Prolineserver - nominated by Katarighe -- Katarighe (Talk) 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Katarighe (Talk) 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)- I think it is not the good file to be nominated. The better should be, perhaps, this one.--Jebulon (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- The picture is replaced. --Katarighe (Talk) 00:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Also if you don't mind, I added image notes to illustrate the photo. You can undo my action if it feels not good to the picture. --Katarighe (Talk) 16:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- The picture is replaced. --Katarighe (Talk) 00:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Conrado (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC). The maternal grandmother of the Princess was Brazilian! That's cool!
- Support good image--David საქართველო 18:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Info - I think this one - currently the lead image in the wedding article - is the best one. A pity his hand is slightly over his face, but considering that this is a one-time-only event, I think it's a great photo and I decide to nominate here as a FP yesterday. --Katarighe (Talk) 22:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Everyone can use a bit of bright and cheery. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment Well, I hope that wasn't meant as an argument for making it a FP. As someone who was forced to pay for this wedding I don't find it cheery in any way, but like your comment that has nothing to do with the quality of the picture. / Achird (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment No, bright and cheery was a statement of fact. Other facts include high EV, well executed and a bit of wow. As to the cost... surely outweighed by short and longer term economic benefits. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- The photo is actually featured on the English Wikipedia proof. The photo is selected to as POTY for June 19th, 2012 on en.wiki. --Katarighe (Talk) 22:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Support. — Raghith 10:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Neutral -- I wouldn't say I didn't like this image, but I don't do like it either. I think an image of the Royal Wedding with Kate and William would be better. TrebleSeven (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Gnangarra 03:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC); added "alternative"--miya (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People
The chosen alternative is: File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05 edit.jpg
