Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotdrossel.jpg

File:Rotdrossel.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 10:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rotdrossel.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotdrossel.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Turdidae (Thrushes)
•  Info created by hobbyfotowiki - uploaded by hobbyfotowiki - nominated by Hobbyfotowiki -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info Hi Hobbyfotowiki, you have to add this page to COM:FPC to make it visible, I'll do that for you. Take a look and learn for the next time. I'll also fix the FP category for you, you need to familiarize yourself with that too. All the best, --Cart (talk) 10:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment love the smooth background, but the crop is a bit tight, imho, especially at the top and I think a little bit of local brightening in the eye/head area could give it some more "pop". --El Grafo (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The crop is a bit tight, sure, but the image quality is great. Also, awwww. Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Yes, very good sharpness and detail, but I'd like some light on the bird - not necessarily in post, but for a beam of sunlight to have been on the bird's face. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very good resolution with detail, but crop is imho too tight. --Ivar (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info - Thank you very much for your comments. They are always useful. But I have to inform you that I didn´t cropped this photo. Perhaps this time I should go a few steps back to have more backrgound, but with my 300mm lens I am quit happy if there isn´t too much distance between me and the birds.And Yes, a sunny day perhaps would be better, but I on my own like bird pictures without sunschine, too, but they are special... Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are several issues here, the top crop is definitely too tight, sharpness is good but not excellent, specially the peak and the lighting is not really good Poco² 14:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Could you please add coordinates or location where the photo was taken, we usually expect that from FPCs. --Cart (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info - I have shot on the island of Helgoland(talk) 19:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

• You need to add such info to description on the file page not here; this page will be archived in 9 days, the info and the corresponding categories needs to be where people will see it all the time. This goes for your other nomination as well. Take a look at this file as an example of what good description and categorization looks like. --Cart (talk) 19:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not perfect quality - per Poco. -- Karelj (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top. @hobbyfotowiki: Many of your uploads are very tightly framed (1, 2, 3...). You should try to grant more room to the subject in your compositions, they need to breath visually -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just doesn't stand out from our many bird pictures for me. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination hobbyfotowiki([[User talk:hobbyfotowikitalk]]| 21:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)