Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rengasvesiliuku Serena 2.jpg

File:Rengasvesiliuku Serena 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2011 at 06:38:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rengasvesiliuku Serena 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rengasvesiliuku Serena 2.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 06:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Love the expression of the soon-to-be-wet child. —kallerna™ 06:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Educational Value? -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 20:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  •  Support Water parks? Amusement parks? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 12:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
    • I can't see a water park. Just blue in blue... -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 08:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice shot -- Raghith (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice image, but I don't see the educational value, either. It looks like a person in water- teaching little. Courcelles (talk) 08:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Question What is all this talk about "educational value" ?, this is not en:wiki FPC --Tony Wills (talk) 12:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  • On EnWiki FPC, educational value is almost everything. Here, it is not everything, but still important - here we don't feature images based on quality alone. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, they need to have some educational value to be within scope of the project (otherwise deleted), but it has never been a criteria on FPC. We don't make value judgements on its possible use across a miriad of projects. It has always been about the best of what we have in terms of high quality, striking images. --Tony Wills (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)