Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus caama) (2).jpg

File:Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus caama) (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2011 at 10:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus caama) (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus caama) (2).jpg

•  Info created by Frames-of-Mind - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- Bruce1ee^talk 10:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bruce1ee^talk 10:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Even though it looks too noisy de-noised, composition and color make a really pleasant view. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Excellent. -- Scottthezombie (talk) 17:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Quan (talk) 09:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Bunnyfrosch (talk) 13:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The Hartebeest's are not red enough! --99of9 (talk) 04:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor light, quality and colors --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten. Are those animals so "verticaly strait" in real ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose same as Carschten --Dabit100 (talk) 00:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral I want to support, but I'm skeptical of the sepia tone. Why do it? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)