Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG

File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2014 at 11:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG

•  Info Comprehensive view of the waterfalls over the Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla, Huasca de Ocampo, State of Hidalgo, Mexico. All by me, Poco² 11:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 11:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice place, high geological interest and value ! But you were not lucky with the weather, and the long exposure has consequences: a disturbing ghost crossing the bridge...--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

   Done Ghost removed. Poco² 19:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks. Have you tried a crop out of the sky, and an increasing of the vibrance ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

    • I have tried it and created the alternative below with the result. The "bad weather issue" is gone but the result is pretty different to the former one. Poco² 21:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

      • Thanks again for your efforts... I don't know what to think now...--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment - I played with boosting the saturation in a local copy of this image, and I think it helped, but I would exclude that bright patch of grass behind the trees in the upper right from the process. I also think a shift of the view slightly to the left could help -- remove that fragment of a road from the right side and move the left end of the footbridge a little farther from the left edge of the image, though I cannot say what that would then bring into the picture. I don't know whether these changes would make it FP, though. --Kbh3^rdtalk 17:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

   Done I increased saturation, chose a warmer WB and cropped the road on the right. Poco² 19:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Neutral Good and well composed (centered), it's a pity for the weather. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 22:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 19:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Wow for me. Another giant's causeway! --Kadellar (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great catch in every way. --Lauro Sirgado^contribs 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Alternative with a different top crop and higher vibrance setting Poco² 21:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 21:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment - I believe the sky weigh a little (bit) unfavorable, but without it the image (in the first contact) is devoid of depth IMO. --Lauro Sirgado^contribs 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Jee 16:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 25.JPG