Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo November 2009-1a.jpg

File:Porto Covo November 2009-1a.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 23:36:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo November 2009-1a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo November 2009-1a.jpg

•  Info Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal.View from south. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Mer30. Takabeg (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very detailed -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 19:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Phyrexian (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Congratulations!--Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful. Tiptoety ^talk 07:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice view. Could be a featured one. But from the left side to the point with the little boat the picture is too blurry, and because of that there are some stiching errors --Simonizer (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Done -- Thanks for noticing, Simon. It is fixed now. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment What have you done? The whole picture is still blurry at the left side from the bottom to the top and especially at the bottom there are still many stitching errors --Simonizer (talk) 21:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info - Nothing can be done about the blurring, but the stitching errors were fixed (again) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good image --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Simonizer. Also I do not like blown-out highlights in some of the waves. Sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info - No blown highlights in either of the three basic colours, that is an easy check to make. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Maybe I used a wrong term, I meant I did not like lack of details in some of the white part of the waves.--Mbz1 (talk) 10:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas