Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Point Lobos 3.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Point Lobos 3.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 18:51:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by mbz1 - uploaded by mbz1 - nominated by mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment -- Impressive view. But needs a straigth horizon... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- I believe I did. Have you checked it?--Mbz1 (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it very curved right now... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Another try is in. If it still not straight, it is just an optical illusion :) Seriously, if it still not straight, please fix it, somebody --Mbz1 (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- If it's a stitch, I'd be happy to help if u trust me enough to send me original pictures. - Benh (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the Earth is curved... –Juliancolton | Talk 15:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Another try is in. If it still not straight, it is just an optical illusion :) Seriously, if it still not straight, please fix it, somebody --Mbz1 (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it very curved right now... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support The horizon is indeed curved, but then again, the earth is round. It does not, however, detract from the overall quality. Good shot. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support nice --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --патриот8790 (talk) 06:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support –Juliancolton | Talk 15:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose nothing special: rather boring!--alpinus5 (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Earth is curved, but not to the point that it's visible at such distance. Oppose because nothing special, although looks sexy. - Benh (talk) 17:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing special??? How many landscape shots one could call "sexy" . On a more serious note. I do not think it is still curved. I checked it. IMO it looks fine. What you see as a curved horizon is just an optical illusion --Mbz1 (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- OK, "Nothing special" is rather a subjective thing... and for this reason we could debate endlessly. I believe anyone could take this (including myself, I've taken some, and even upload a few to wiki, albeit maybe not as impressive), and u've proven you could take shots not so many of us here could. As for the horizon, I can even see this on thumbnail. I've moved the horizon against the bottom border of my monitor: either my monitor or the horizon is curved. In case it's the horizon, you can fix it. I also repeat my proposition to help. If it's my monitor, I'll try to see if my warranty covers this, or have a look at the specs again (was it actually flat screen ?) - Benh (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, Benh, if you'd like to work with the image, please do. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- I was more thinking about restitching it ;-), but up to you - Benh (talk) 05:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, Benh, if you'd like to work with the image, please do. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it's curved — I just checked in GIMP, and the left and right ends of the horizon are both about 12 pixels lower than the midpoint. Compared to all the other work that must've gone into creating this, restitching with a couple of horizontal rules shouldn't be too hard (although I can understand your reluctance to do it if you've done a lot of postprocessing after stitching). —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- OK, "Nothing special" is rather a subjective thing... and for this reason we could debate endlessly. I believe anyone could take this (including myself, I've taken some, and even upload a few to wiki, albeit maybe not as impressive), and u've proven you could take shots not so many of us here could. As for the horizon, I can even see this on thumbnail. I've moved the horizon against the bottom border of my monitor: either my monitor or the horizon is curved. In case it's the horizon, you can fix it. I also repeat my proposition to help. If it's my monitor, I'll try to see if my warranty covers this, or have a look at the specs again (was it actually flat screen ?) - Benh (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing special??? How many landscape shots one could call "sexy" . On a more serious note. I do not think it is still curved. I checked it. IMO it looks fine. What you see as a curved horizon is just an optical illusion --Mbz1 (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose It is pretty, but not special enough, imho, for an FP. I am sorry. Crapload (talk) 02:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Good, but IMO not that good. Sorry. —kallerna™ 18:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural