Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poecile atricapillus CT.jpg

File:Poecile atricapillus CT.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2010 at 23:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Poecile atricapillus CT.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poecile atricapillus CT.jpg

•  Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 23:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cephas (talk) 23:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like too much the lighting, specially on the head --Llorenzi (talk) 15:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Could it just be because the bird's head is black? I looked in full res and the lighting seems pretty good... Steven Walling 22:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
    •  Comment Good lighting on black parts of birds is always a challenge. It is not so bad on this pic, some reflection and details are visible on the head. --Cephas (talk) 23:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support One of my favorite birds to boot. Steven Walling 22:27, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - would have preferred a slightly less tight crop on the tail, but still very good quality - MPF (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Whites are overexposed (blue channel slightly blown), affecting the detail. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

• Correction of crop, overexposition and "blue blowing" (thanks for your comments Alvesgaspar, it is helpfull). --Cephas (talk) 00:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

• I agree this is a difficult shot due to the high dynamic range. Notice that the image of the bird would come out much better with a light background -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose The branch on the left detracts from the aesthetics IMO. --99of9 (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition issues: very dark background behind black head. --Elekhh (talk) 06:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support---Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Trace (talk) 10:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)